• Experienced | Successful | Since 1971

Posts By :

CMZ Law

Golf Cart-Related Injuries
Golf Cart-Related Injuries 150 150 CMZ Law Lufkin/Houston

Golf carts are slow-moving vehicles, but that does not mean that they cannot cause injuries. In fact, golf car accidents are more common than you might think, and they can result in severe and even life-threatening injuries. If you have been injured while riding or driving a golf cart, you may have a legal claim. Our team can help you understand your options.

Prevalence of Golf Cart Accidents

There are approximately 15,000 golf cart accidents in the United States every year that lead to a trip to the hospital. The Consumer Products Safety Commission reports that roughly 40 percent of all golf cart injuries occur because the vehicle flips, and nearly one-third of those injured are children. Interestingly, only half of all golf cart injuries occur on golf courses.

Golf carts are “open air” vehicles, which means they have no protection on most of the sides of the car. They also have no seat belts or another restraint mechanism in most models. It is easy for passengers to fly out of the cart, resulting in injuries. Rollovers are common because the vehicles can turn quickly, but are somewhat top heavy. Even uneven ground can cause a driver to lose control of the cart.

Golf cart injuries often result from several common scenarios, including:

  • Collisions with other golf carts or objects
  • Pedestrians being hit with golf carts
  • Being thrown from a golf cart because of driver error
  • Being hurt in a rollover accident due to driver recklessness or carelessness
  • Injuries resulting from being hit by a car while operating a golf cart

Golf carts are often used a means to get to and from the golf course as well as to other destinations. Children commonly drive golf carts as a means of travel and entertainment as well. Use has also increased in recent years, according to the National Golf Cart Association, because of the increase in gas prices and number of retirees.

Insurance and Golf Cart Injuries

Your insurance policy may cover golf cart injuries. It is important to read policy language carefully to determine coverage. Motorcycle and ATV coverage may include injuries related to golf carts. Homeowners’ insurance may also cover golf carts, but there are often very specific limitations that apply.

When golf cart injuries occur on someone else’s property, their insurance may provide coverage as well. These situations can get complicated, so it is especially important to involve a personal injury attorney in those circumstances.

Common Golf Cart Injuries

Golf cart injuries vary significantly from relatively minor to extremely severe. The most common golf cart injuries include:

  • Foot and leg injuries
  • Bruises
  • Strained neck or back
  • Whiplash
  • Cuts
  • Broken bones
  • Crush injuries (particularly in rollover accidents)

Head and neck injuries are often the most serious damages that occur after a golf cart accident. They can result in long-term health problems and even death.

Liability for Golf Cart Accidents

Legal responsibility for golf car accidents will vary depending on the cause of the crash. For example, if the accident was due to driver error, then the driver may be liable for your injuries. If the golf cart malfunctioned, then liability may rest with the manufacturer of the cart or anyone that did maintenance work or repairs.

Your attorney will be able to help you determine who may be liable and whether you have a viable legal claim. Contact our firm today for more information.

Head Injuries in Car Accidents
Head Injuries in Car Accidents 150 150 CMZ Law Lufkin/Houston

Car accidents commonly cause head injuries. These injuries can range in severity from extremely minor to those that may even result in death. In fact, more than half of all reported traumatic brain injuries are the result of an auto accident. Any time there is a strong force imposed against the skull, whether that is from an object striking the skull or from a sudden stop, it can result in a debilitating head injury.

Head injuries can occur even when the victim does not have an open wound. The brain can be forced into the skull, resulting in brain bruising and bleeding. These injuries can be tough to detect, but they can be life-threatening. If you suspect anyone has a head injury after a car accident, it is essential to seek medical attention right away.

Causes of Head Injuries in a Car Accident

Car crashes are dangerous. Causes of a head injury will vary depending on the type of accident.

  • Penetration Injuries. When an object pierces the skull, it can result in brain damage. The object can impact the brain or even penetrate the brain, causing bleeding and long-term nerve damage.
  • Force Injuries. The force of suddenly stopping can cause damage to the brain when it hits the front and back of the skull.
  • Injuries Caused by Objects. Flying objects or people in the car can hit your skull hard enough to result in a head injury. Drivers and passengers often hit their heads against the steering wheel or dashboard, resulting in a force-related injury.

Side Effects of a Head Injury

You do not have to lose consciousness to have a head injury. In fact, damage to the brain or skull may be hard to detect. If you have any of the following symptoms, you or your passengers should seek medical attention for a head injury.

  • Slowed response times
  • Difficulty thinking or concentrating
  • Headaches
  • Sensitivity to light or sounds
  • Trouble with balance or coordination
  • Nausea
  • Feelings of fatigue
  • Abnormal feelings of alertness
  • Moodiness or unnatural emotional reactions

Extremely severe head injuries may also have the following symptoms.

  • Seizures
  • Periods of unconsciousness
  • Numbness in the arms or legs
  • Confusion
  • Dilated pupils
  • Aggression

Severe head injuries can result in additional health problems. Seek medical attention immediately.

Keep in mind that symptoms of a head injury may not appear immediately after an accident. In fact, it can take hours, days, or even weeks after the crash to notice a head injury. It is always a good idea to get a full physical after a car crash, even if you think you only have minor injuries.

Recovering from a Head Injury

The recovery timeline for a head injury will vary a great deal depending on the severity of the injury and the individual. For example, younger adults will usually recover faster than older adults.

Those who suffer from a severe traumatic brain injury may see residual effects from the injury even years after they have made an otherwise full recovery. On the other hand, less severe injuries may only take a few days to weeks to heal completely.

If you or a loved one has been involved in a car accident that resulted in a head injury, you may be entitled to compensation. Our team can help you determine whether asserting a legal claim is in your best interest. Call today for more information.

 

Texting While Driving Law Change in Texas
Texting While Driving Law Change in Texas 150 150 CMZ Law Lufkin/Houston

Q: Will the new texting while driving law reduce accidents and personal injury claims?

Texas car accidents can be caused by a number of factors including driving while intoxicated, speeding, aggressive driving, weather conditions, mechanical defects, and more.

Car accidents caused by a driver’s negligent, reckless, or intentional actions or inactions often leave seriously injured, disabled, or dead victims in their wake and are often the basis of a personal injury lawsuit or a wrongful death action.

Once liability is established, car accident victims may be entitled to compensatory damages including past and future medical bills for treatment or rehabilitation, past and future mental anguish and physical pain, Physical impairment or disfigurement, past and future loss of income and loss of earning capacity. If the victim dies from their injuries, their closest surviving family members may be entitled to damages as well through a wrongful death lawsuit, but who has standing to sue and the type of damages they can recover differs on a case-by-case basis so consulting a skilled personal injury attorney is advised.

Another common cause of motor vehicle accidents is distracted driving. And one of the biggest distractions is texting while driving.

In an effort to discourage texting while driving, new legislation went into effect on September 1, 2017. The new law, reportedly described by its own co-author as “something is better than nothing” has its share of loopholes.

According to the law, drivers are reportedly permitted to:

  • make and receive phone calls in accordance with local laws
  • use navigation applications
  • use music applications.

Reported ambiguities surround the unaddressed use of “internet browsers, search functions, gaming, or other phone applications, although “the use of messaging and communications applications like Facebook, Facebook Messenger and Twitter appear to be prohibited”.

With respect to texting while driving, the new law offers reportedly some exemptions including:

  • texting during emergency situations (though it doesn’t define what constitutes an “emergency”)
  • workers texting the office so long as their phones are mounted
  • on-duty emergency vehicle operators are exempt
  • on-duty law enforcement vehicle operators are exempt
  • hands free texting is allowed.

These loophole defenses, coupled with the mandate that ticketing officers “must not only witness offenders using their phones, but identify that the activity is specifically texting” will make the new law difficult to enforce.

Of course, the safest way to avoid being distracted or being accused of causing a motor vehicle accident is to avoid cell phone distractions entirely.

If you or a loved one has been injured or a loved one has been killed in a motor vehicle accident due to someone else’s negligence, the lawyers at Chandler, Mathis, and Zivley, PC will investigate your case and take legal action to help you obtain the maximum compensation to which you are entitled. Contact our office for a free consultation.

From our offices in Houston and Lufkin, we’ve been serving clients throughout Texas as well as many other states for over 40 years.

 

Texas Accident Results in Fatality, Reinforces Danger of Motorcycles
Texas Accident Results in Fatality, Reinforces Danger of Motorcycles 150 150 CMZ Law Lufkin/Houston

Texas Accident Results in Fatality, Reinforces Danger of Motorcycles

Driving or riding on a motorcycle in Texas can be a lot of fun. With the sun shining down on you and the fresh wind whipping your face, they provide a very different feeling than that of a car. However, with little protection, motorcycle drivers often find themselves much more susceptible to injury than drivers of cars or trucks. This is due in part to the fact that they have less stability and visibility as well as higher performance capabilities than cars.

Jarring Statistics

According to a 2018 report by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the government has estimated than in 2016 for every mile traveled, the number of motorcycle fatalities was 28 times greater than that of cars. Per the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s Highway Loss Data Institute, in 2017 a total of 5,172 motorcyclists died in crashes and accounted for 14 percent of all motor vehicle crash deaths. The same year saw more than twice as many motorcyclist deaths as were seen in 1997. Of these deaths in 2017, 38 percent occurred in single-vehicle crashes, while 62 percent occurred in multiple-vehicle crashes.

These devastating statistics are evidenced in a recent crash. Earlier this month, a motorcycle and a pickup truck were going southbound on a local Texas road when they were involved in an accident. Although much is still unknown as to the exact cause of the crash, according to investigators the truck was traveling behind the motorcycle when the driver of the latter slowed down for a red light. It has since been established that the truck hit the motorcycle from behind, before crashing into a utility pole and consequently bringing down live power wires.

A Devastating Outcome

The crash, which occurred shortly before midnight, resulted in multiple injuries. According to multiple witnesses of the crash, they worked to help the victims. They also worked to pull one of the two occupants of the truck to safety. The truck went up in flames, and the two occupants of the truck were transported to a local hospital, while the motorcyclist was transported to a medical facility. While both truck occupants survived, unfortunately the motorcyclist was not so lucky. He later died from his injuries.

Wrongful Death and Other Legal Actions

The investigation is still underway, though when it is finished, it is possible that authorities may find that the accident was caused due to the negligence of the truck driver failing to stop. If enough evidence is gathered to help prove this belief, the family of the deceased may choose to pursue a case for wrongful death in a Texas civil court. Dependent upon the circumstances and evidence found, a knowledgeable and experienced personal injury attorney may be able to discuss with the family their available legal actions. Should they prove victorious, this award may assist them in paying for various costs such as lost income and funeral expenses.

Fosamax Litigation Continues
Fosamax Litigation Continues 150 150 CMZ Law Lufkin/Houston

Will the U.S. Supreme Court find Merck liable for failing to provide adequate warnings about Fosamax?

Fosamax is a prescription drug manufactured by mega-company Merck.  It was created to help treat osteoporosis and other diseases that cause bone loss.  Given that one in three women worldwide and one in five men over 50 will suffer from osteoporotic related fractures, Fosamax and other drugs like it are big business.  Fosamax claims that it will slow bone loss and improve bone density, but alarming evidence of the potential link between the drug and fractures has emerged. Now, thousands of Fosamax users have filed suit against Merck, claiming that the dangerous drug led them to suffer thigh bone fractures and the company failed to warn them of the risks.

As other claimants joined in the action against Merck, Merck sought dismissal of the claims.  Merck submitted evidence that it had notified the FDA back in 2008of a potential link between the drug and some bone fractures.  However, the FDA rejected its proposal to a warning label to the drug. It wasn’t until 2010 when the FDA ordered a revision of the labels to include a warning, which Merck did.

In federal court in New Jersey, Merck urged that the claims against it should be dismissed because the FDA rejected its proposed warning label, which it believes should exclude liability.  However, the 3rd Circuit ruled the case should proceed because the jury could find that the FDA would have accepted a properly worded warning concerning fracture risks.

The Supreme Court Takes Up the Case

Now, at the urging of President Trump, the U.S. Supreme Court has elected to hear the case. At issue will be the crucial question as to whether a pharmaceutical company can be liable for failing to warn drug users as to known risks when the FDA rejects its proposed warnings.  The issue is a crucial one that could have wide spread implications.

If the Supreme Court finds that Merck is relieved of liability, it could leave consumers crucially unprotected against potentially dangerous or defective drugs.  Individuals harmed by dangerous drugs that did not come with adequate warnings could be left without legal avenues, and product makers may further lose financial incentive to create comprehensive, up-to-date warnings.  On the other hand, most would agree that the FDA needs to be more proactive in issuing potentially lifesaving warnings when made aware of this need by drug makers. All of us should closely watch this case, which may have an impact on anyone who will ever take a prescription drug.

The Dangers of Xarelto
The Dangers of Xarelto 150 150 CMZ Law Lufkin/Houston

What injuries have been linked to Xarelto?

Xarelto (rivaroxaban) is a drug released by Bayer Healthcare in tandem with Janssen Pharmaceuticals to thin the blood. Xarelto is prescribed to patients at risk of stroke or those with atrial fibrillation in order to prevent clots. The drug is also approved to treat those with deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or individuals who have recently undergone surgery. Xarelto can prove effective in treating some illnesses, but evidence has now emerged as to Xarelto’s potentially dangerous propensities. Already, hundreds of defective drug lawsuits have been filed against the makers of Xarelto.

Xarelto Facts

Xarelto is one of the newer classes of blood thinners. It was initially introduced in 2011 as an alternative to the traditional blood thinner Warfarin. Xarelto is similar in nature to the blood thinner Pradaxa, which is now one of the most litigated drugs in the United States.

Xarelto’s Potentially Serious Side Effects

Xarelto has been linked to several serious and potentially even fatal side effects, including:

Heart arrhythmiaExcessive bleedingCoughing up bloodBlood pressure changesNosebleedsGastrointestinal bleedingRectal bleedingBrain hemorrhagingDeathThe immense dangers of Xarelto are largely linked to its lack of an antidote. When Xarelto was initially released in 2011, it did not have an antidote that could reverse internal or external bleeding that could occur due to surgery, an accident, or a side effect of the drug. Warfarin, on the other hand, has a reversing agent that can quickly stop the effects of the drug to stop bleeding fast. According to several lawsuits and safety officials, the makers of Xarelto did not adequately warn physicians or patients as to the lack of an antidote and the related serious risks of ongoing bleeding. Anyone who has suffered an injury due to Xarelto may be eligible to seek compensation from the makers of this dangerous drug. Injuries linked to Xarelto can inflict financial hardships on patients. Xarelto victims may be able to seek compensation for their medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other ongoing disabilities stemming from the drug. Contact a defective drug attorney for an analysis of your legal rights and overview of your necessary next steps.
Heart arrhythmiaExcessive bleedingCoughing up bloodBlood pressure changesNosebleedsGastrointestinal bleedingRectal bleedingBrain hemorrhagingDeathThe immense dangers of Xarelto are largely linked to its lack of an antidote. When Xarelto was initially released in 2011, it did not have an antidote that could reverse internal or external bleeding that could occur due to surgery, an accident, or a side effect of the drug. Warfarin, on the other hand, has a reversing agent that can quickly stop the effects of the drug to stop bleeding fast. According to several lawsuits and safety officials, the makers of Xarelto did not adequately warn physicians or patients as to the lack of an antidote and the related serious risks of ongoing bleeding. Anyone who has suffered an injury due to Xarelto may be eligible to seek compensation from the makers of this dangerous drug. Injuries linked to Xarelto can inflict financial hardships on patients. Xarelto victims may be able to seek compensation for their medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other ongoing disabilities stemming from the drug. Contact a defective drug attorney for an analysis of your legal rights and overview of your necessary next steps. 150 150 CMZ Law Lufkin/Houston

What injuries have been linked to Xarelto?

Xarelto (rivaroxaban) is a drug released by Bayer Healthcare in tandem with Janssen Pharmaceuticals to thin the blood. Xarelto is prescribed to patients at risk of stroke or those with atrial fibrillation in order to prevent clots. The drug is also approved to treat those with deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or individuals who have recently undergone surgery.

Heartburn Drugs May Pose Health Risks
Heartburn Drugs May Pose Health Risks 150 150 CMZ Law Lufkin/Houston

Can I file a lawsuit against a pharmaceutical company if I am injured by a medication?

A recent clinical study by the Houston Methodist Research Institute indicates that a class of heartburn drugs, proton pump inhibitors or PPIs, put users at increased risk of heart attack, stroke and renal failure. These drugs, sold under brand names such as Prevacid, Prilosec and Nexium, may cause damage to cells in the arteries.

While PPIs are designed to inhibit acid production by cells known as lysosomes, the drugs may also prevent cells from dividing and reproducing, leading to plaque buildup in the walls of blood vessels. In addition to the risk of heart attacks and other maladies, cell damage in the arteries is also linked to dementia and cancer. In the study, where cells were exposed to the PPI Nexium that mimicked long-term usage, researchers also found chromosome damage that is associated with these age-related diseases.  Meanwhile, other heartburn medications known as H2 blockers – the active ingredient in Zantac, do not cause similar damage to artery cells.

One of the researchers involved in the study noted that this should have been detected by the pharmaceutical industry earlier. At the same time, he also suggested that many PPI users take these drugs on a long-term basis, contrary to FDA guidelines which limits the use of PPIs to four weeks at a time, three times a year.

For its part, AstraZeneca, the maker of Nexium, refuted the findings. The drug maker argued that this was not a controlled clinical study conducted in humans and that causation cannot be established. AstraZeneca also said it believes PPIs are safe, provide they are use according to instructions. However, the FDA previously warned (in 2010) that PPIs can have other adverse effects such as increased risk of fractures and low levels of magnesium in addition to the potential for cardiovascular problems.

While more research will be needed to evaluate the risks of PPIs, some users have begun to file lawsuits. In the end, pharmaceutical companies that provide medications to consumers have a duty to ensure these products are safe. If these drugs are found to be harmful, drug makers need to be held accountable. If you were injured by a defective medication, a personal injury attorney can help you obtain compensation.

New Jersey Drug Company Pleads Guilty to Selling Contaminated Ultrasound Gel
New Jersey Drug Company Pleads Guilty to Selling Contaminated Ultrasound Gel 150 150 CMZ Law Lufkin/Houston

What was the ultrasound gel sold by a NJ drug company contaminated with?

Pharmaceutical Innovations Inc., a New Jersey pharmaceutical company based in Newark, has recently pleaded guilty to selling ultrasound gel contaminated with bacteria. The gel, used in scans, sonograms, EKGs and similar procedures, makes direct contact with the skin.

How the Case Began

The company was originally targeted by the FDA in 2012. At that time a Michigan hospital reported that 16 surgical patients had been infected with a bacterial pathogen associated with a particular batch of ultrasound gel from Pharmaceutical Innovations. It was found that all of the infected patients had undergone transesophageal ultrasounds during heart valve replacement surgeries which led investigators to suspect the gel as the contaminant. The hospital had then tested the gel and confirmed that it was, in fact, the source of the contamination.

The Charges against Pharmaceutical Innovations

Pharmaceutical Innovations was charged with violating the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Prosecutors charged that FDA inspections of the facility indentified multiple breaches in accepted manufacturing practices. The FDA also said in court filings that the company had failed to resolve their manufacturing issues in spite of repeated warnings.

How the Case Was Resolved

Pharmaceutical Innovations entered a guilty plea in U.S. District Court in Newark to two misdemeanor counts of introducing adulterated medical devices into interstate commerce. The firm was fined $50,000 for the crime and forced to forfeit $50,000 (the approximate value of the defective product) to settle a civil lawsuit regarding its distribution. In addition, the company was placed on two years of probation.

 

Pharmaceutical Innovations also agreed to destroy products that have tested high for infectious bacteria in order to settle the civil suit. Company executives state that they’re now committed to maintaining compliance with all relevant regulations. An injunction has also been issued requiring that the company pay for regular inspections and certifications of its facility by independent experts and auditors.

U.S. Attorney Paul Fishman has stated that “Pharmaceutical Innovations shipped defective products that exposed hospital patients to dangerous bacterial contamination.” He went on to say that the plea agreement and civil settlement indicate that the company has accepted responsibility for the hazardous contamination and is taking steps to prevent any medical missteps in the future.  

Medical mistakes happen all too frequently, not only as a result of medical device failure or product contamination, but because of errors made by hospitals and medical professionals. If you have suffered as a result of a medical, surgical, or medication-related error while in a medical facility or at the hands of a medical professional, you should contact an experienced medical malpractice attorney as soon as possible so that you receive the compensation you deserve.

 

 

 

 

 

Invokana Linked to DKA and Kidney Damage in New Lawsuit
Invokana Linked to DKA and Kidney Damage in New Lawsuit 150 150 CMZ Law Lufkin/Houston

Can you be compensated if you suffered from the serious side effects of a drug?

You are a type-2 diabetic and you need some help managing your symptoms. So, your doctor recommends a new drug that many of his patients have been having a good experience with. He tells you that there may be some side effects but you think to yourself “not me.” Think again! You start experiencing the symptoms of a blood disorder and having kidney problems and your doctor tells you it is from the medication you have been taking. What are your rights? Well, you can bring a lawsuit like a woman from Texas recently did after being seriously impacted by the new drug Invokana.

Invokana is a new type of diabetes drug that prevents some glucose from being absorbed into the body via the kidneys. The unabsorbed glucose is then released through in the urine. The woman began taking Invokana (canagliflozin) in October of 2013, shortly after it had been approved by the Food and Drug Administration and released onto the market. Soon after beginning the medication she claims that she became afflicted with diabetic ketoacidosis and serious kidney problems. After experiencing these symptoms she discontinued the use of the drug in November of 2013. 

She has since brought a lawsuit in a United States District Court in New Jersey. She named the drugs manufacturers, specifically Janssen Pharmaceuticals and their parent company, Johnson & Johnson, as defendants. She claims that the manufacturers should have been aware of the serious health risks associated with the drug and that they should have included appropriate warnings on the packaging.  It does seem like the manufacturers were aware of the possibility of the side effects after the FDA raised a concern about DKA. A report was also issued in 2014 regarding the kidney issues associated with the drug. The woman even goes as far to allege that she would have never used the drug if she knew of the possibility of these side effects. She is seeking $10 million in damages.

If you suffered personal injury as the result of the use of a defective drug or medical device, you should speak to an experienced Houston, Texas attorney today.

 

Practice Areas of Attorney Houston Tx Legal Practice Areas $27.8 Million Victories Liquid Natural Gas Storage Victories